 |
|
|
Sanyo Xacti VPC-CG9 9MP Flash Memory Camcorder with 5x Optical Zoom (Silver) |
|
|
|
     
|
 |
|
|
|
| | | | |
 |
| Sanyo vid cam |
| This was a present for my 22 yr old son - graduation :) and he is happy with it, it does just what he wants it to and I've seen a few of the results and I too am impressed with the overall quality. |
| Jan 06, 2009 |
| |
|
| Awesome!! |
| This little camera is well worth every penny. It is packed with features that more expensive cameras have for a fraction of their cost. You won't be disappointed. |
| Jan 01, 2009 |
| |
 |
| Disappointed even for standard definition video |
| Without going into extreme detail I found the Sanyo to be adequate for video although not at all impressive. The Sanyo does not have a problem with audio picking up other noises as do most Aiptek units - actually the audio was quite good. The still images were fine outdoor but not much good indoor. Let's just say indoor still photos were between a cell phone camera image and my old 4MP Fuji SLR digital camera. Video was as good as any standard camcorder until there was any motion faster than walking speed. I returned this realizing my money was better spent towards an HD unit that was about 50% more. |
| Dec 06, 2008 |
| |
|
| No so good! |
This camcorder has couple good thing like size and can't think any other so far...
Cons.: Antishake doesn't work and I believe is because the small size of the apparatus. Lotz of flare when object is bright and WORST for me is the HORRENDOUS and DISTURBING sound from the autofocus (chasing object) that you will hear in your movie so you better go for manual focus, "visual noise" if cam is set at 400 and more ISO.... you need to buy a software to edit your movie (about $60).I'm not a PRO but lack of quality electronics disgust me.
Overall this cam is over priced, with SANYO brand I was expecting better performance. It's just OK to capture some moments but just that.
|
| Nov 12, 2008 |
| |
|
| Not professional video, but the most convenient! |
I've been using this camera for about six months now. It makes shooting decent video so incredibly easy. The results are probably just good enough for both pictures and video that it makes it worth it for me. There is a trade off for quality here.
What makes it worth it is the most ergonomically pleasing camera I've ever had the pleasure to use. It fits perfectly in my pocket, including a protective camera case I got for it. There are just too many moments in life and I miss a lot less of them because it's so easy for me to carry around.
It's great for posting to YouTube. It shoots in mp4, which I just upload to YouTube. On the other hand, there are not tons of programs that can edit mp4s. I use Ulead Video Studio 11 and that works very well.
I had been using minidv for years, but the tape drive systems always let me down for a while and are just nowhere near as solid state as a camera like the CG9. After my second minidv camera went I vowed never more. I'm interested in harddrive cameras, but I'm not sure they take very good pictures and I just think that SD cards are the wave of the future.
For me the big draw is being able to write on SD cards. They are amazingly easy to use, except that your computer should probably have pretty advanced graphics/video capabilities. My laptop has a dedicated graphics card, and it's still a bit clunky to preview or edit videos.
I find the swivel lcd impossible to live without.
So overall I think it's a great camera. If you are really sensitive about picture/video quality, this is probably not your camera.
|
| Nov 10, 2008 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|